<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW:  JVC Everio GZ-HD300</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lonseidman.com/2009/05/review-jvc-everio-gz-hd300/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lonseidman.com/2009/05/review-jvc-everio-gz-hd300/</link>
	<description>Democracy is only as good as the people who contribute to it!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: donaldjeo112233</title>
		<link>http://www.lonseidman.com/2009/05/review-jvc-everio-gz-hd300/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>donaldjeo112233</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonseidman.com/?p=593#comment-425</guid>
		<description>yes i agree with you&lt;br&gt;===========&lt;br&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ccnanotes.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cisco ccna&lt;/a&gt; will prepare students with fundamental of networking and to kick start their future in working as a network administrator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes i agree with you<br />===========<br />The <a href="http://www.ccnanotes.com" rel="nofollow">cisco ccna</a> will prepare students with fundamental of networking and to kick start their future in working as a network administrator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonseidman</title>
		<link>http://www.lonseidman.com/2009/05/review-jvc-everio-gz-hd300/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>lonseidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonseidman.com/?p=593#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Just so you know the 30p and 24p on the hf200 are wrapped in a 1080i&lt;br&gt;file, so you need a way to do pulldown to get the true frame rate.&lt;br&gt;Check out Voltaic HD:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shedworx.com/node/107&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.shedworx.com/node/107&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The canon hv40, an HDV cam, does true 24p.  Check out my review on here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you know the 30p and 24p on the hf200 are wrapped in a 1080i<br />file, so you need a way to do pulldown to get the true frame rate.<br />Check out Voltaic HD:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.shedworx.com/node/107" rel="nofollow">http://www.shedworx.com/node/107</a></p>
<p>The canon hv40, an HDV cam, does true 24p.  Check out my review on here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zorrofx</title>
		<link>http://www.lonseidman.com/2009/05/review-jvc-everio-gz-hd300/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>zorrofx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonseidman.com/?p=593#comment-422</guid>
		<description>So I&#039;ve decided to get the Canon Vixia HF200 which does 60i, 24p and 30p. We&#039;ll see how it goes when I receive it.&lt;br&gt;Happy New Year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#39;ve decided to get the Canon Vixia HF200 which does 60i, 24p and 30p. We&#39;ll see how it goes when I receive it.<br />Happy New Year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zorrofx</title>
		<link>http://www.lonseidman.com/2009/05/review-jvc-everio-gz-hd300/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>zorrofx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonseidman.com/?p=593#comment-421</guid>
		<description>I know it&#039;s been a while since this discussion but I want to add my story: After reading all the specs I bought the Everio thinking it would record at 1080p but after shooting some tests and looking at the shots in a Quicktime movie I discovered the footage was actually interlaced. Big disappointment! I specifically asked for a 1080p camera because I hate the interlaced footage for doing graphics work. It&#039;s irrelevant how the signal is output, the images are still interlaced. Then I saw lonseidman&#039;s article and I knew I&#039;d bought the wrong camera. I returned it today.&lt;br&gt;Just or the record, the Sanyo Xacti HD1010 records 1080i/1080p and other formats as well.&lt;br&gt;BTW it&#039;s a nightmare to convert Everio&#039;s files for use in a non-Intel Mac!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#39;s been a while since this discussion but I want to add my story: After reading all the specs I bought the Everio thinking it would record at 1080p but after shooting some tests and looking at the shots in a Quicktime movie I discovered the footage was actually interlaced. Big disappointment! I specifically asked for a 1080p camera because I hate the interlaced footage for doing graphics work. It&#39;s irrelevant how the signal is output, the images are still interlaced. Then I saw lonseidman&#39;s article and I knew I&#39;d bought the wrong camera. I returned it today.<br />Just or the record, the Sanyo Xacti HD1010 records 1080i/1080p and other formats as well.<br />BTW it&#39;s a nightmare to convert Everio&#39;s files for use in a non-Intel Mac!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lon Seidman</title>
		<link>http://www.lonseidman.com/2009/05/review-jvc-everio-gz-hd300/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Lon Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonseidman.com/?p=593#comment-381</guid>
		<description>&quot;I do take issue with JVC&#039;s 1080/60p badging on the product tag. They are just saying their DSP and software can supporting de-interlacing to this progressive scan rate.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks you agree with my point which was what I wrote about.  The badging leads some to believe that it is a 1080p camera which it is not.  It records at 1080i just like everything else on the market in that product space.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And for the record there are better cameras out there.  Canon&#039;s older HF100, which can be found for about the same price, is a lot more flexible in its manual controls and includes the external audio port.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I do take issue with JVC&#39;s 1080/60p badging on the product tag. They are just saying their DSP and software can supporting de-interlacing to this progressive scan rate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks you agree with my point which was what I wrote about.  The badging leads some to believe that it is a 1080p camera which it is not.  It records at 1080i just like everything else on the market in that product space.  </p>
<p>And for the record there are better cameras out there.  Canon&#39;s older HF100, which can be found for about the same price, is a lot more flexible in its manual controls and includes the external audio port.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everio</title>
		<link>http://www.lonseidman.com/2009/05/review-jvc-everio-gz-hd300/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Everio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonseidman.com/?p=593#comment-380</guid>
		<description>&quot;I stand by my review. If you took the time to read it (which you clearly&lt;br&gt;did not) I stated the camera records video at 1080i which it does. I also&lt;br&gt;stated that the marketing materials for the camcorder may lead some to&lt;br&gt;believe that the camera records video at 1080p. It does not.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[EVERIO] &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A) Up until only very recently, the HDV Consortium (Composed of JVC, the developer of HDV I might add, SONY, SHARP, amongst others) did not include 1080p in the HDV standard. Your point is moot because only VERY EXPENSIVE professional cameras can record at 1080/30p, let alone the film industry standard 1080/24p HD camcorders.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;B) At this point, NO CONSUMER camera records at 1080p, this however does not mean the camera is not a 1080p camera. This is where I take issue with your commentary. The video is recorded at 1080/60i, which really just means the odd lines are scanned once 30x and the even lines are scanned once 30x = 60 fields interlaced per second. So while 60 fields are scanned per second, the screen is scanned twice. Since with Progressive scanning, you&#039;re scanning in sequence (Not odds and evens), when the signal is de-interlaced, this translates into 30 fields per second. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bottom line, if you connect this camcorder to a 1080p TV or burn the data to a BD, you will be looking at 1080p video upon playback. The camera uses very sophisticated algorithms to de-interlace, NOT &quot;Upconvert&quot; as you incorrectly stated, the video so the video outputed is up to 1080p. So what you&#039;re saying is moot in my opinion since the output is a true 1080p, regardless of the the actual image being captured at 1080/60i. The camera has a Digital Signal Processor (DSP) and proprietary software that handles this output conversion. The only case it really matters to record natively at 1080/30p is where the utmost image intregrity must be preserved. There is technically a very small amount of loss in de-interlacing the video, not much, but there is some. Obviously for professional usage, this becomes increasingly important.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Had you stated that no consumer cameras record at true 1080p, I would not have objected to your review. JVC has every right to state the camera is a 1080p camera if it&#039;s input and output is 1080p without upconversion. There is zero upconversion, there is de-interlacing, two very different things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;It is not true that all televisions upconvert to progressive format. In&lt;br&gt;fact my older Panasonic CRT is a 1080i device. Not 1080p. Not 720p.&lt;br&gt;Regardless, the point is irrelevant - the camera&#039;s recording format is what&lt;br&gt;I questioned, not what some television might do with the video.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[EVERIO]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Correct. I never said all TVs upconvert. 1080p TVs do de-interlace 1080i signals, this is why it&#039;s not likely HDTV will be broadcast anytime soon at anything more than 1080i. Broadcasting at 1080p would require too much bandwidth and would be pointless since TVs can de-interlace&lt;br&gt;so efficiently. We are talking 1080p, not about your old 1080i TV which can&#039;t handle 1080p. So&lt;br&gt;as I stated, above, if you connect the Everio to a 1080p TV, you will get 1080p video, not 1080i.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Don&#039;t come on my site with insulting commentary when you don&#039;t take the time&lt;br&gt;to actually read what&#039;s written. Thanks.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[EVERIO] Why post commentary and open up your commentary to comment, then complain when someone calls you on inaccuracy. If you&#039;re going to do this, I&#039;m not sure why you have a comment box. To me, your commentary was insulting and misleading to me, so I responded as such. There is nothing personal in it, I just don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair of you however to make people think they got shafted on this camera with they in fact did not. The camera delivers in spades as advertised.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do take issue with JVC&#039;s 1080/60p badging on the product tag. They are just saying their DSP and software can supporting de-interlacing to this progressive scan rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I stand by my review. If you took the time to read it (which you clearly<br />did not) I stated the camera records video at 1080i which it does. I also<br />stated that the marketing materials for the camcorder may lead some to<br />believe that the camera records video at 1080p. It does not.&#8221;</p>
<p>[EVERIO] </p>
<p>A) Up until only very recently, the HDV Consortium (Composed of JVC, the developer of HDV I might add, SONY, SHARP, amongst others) did not include 1080p in the HDV standard. Your point is moot because only VERY EXPENSIVE professional cameras can record at 1080/30p, let alone the film industry standard 1080/24p HD camcorders.</p>
<p>B) At this point, NO CONSUMER camera records at 1080p, this however does not mean the camera is not a 1080p camera. This is where I take issue with your commentary. The video is recorded at 1080/60i, which really just means the odd lines are scanned once 30x and the even lines are scanned once 30x = 60 fields interlaced per second. So while 60 fields are scanned per second, the screen is scanned twice. Since with Progressive scanning, you&#39;re scanning in sequence (Not odds and evens), when the signal is de-interlaced, this translates into 30 fields per second. </p>
<p>Bottom line, if you connect this camcorder to a 1080p TV or burn the data to a BD, you will be looking at 1080p video upon playback. The camera uses very sophisticated algorithms to de-interlace, NOT &#8220;Upconvert&#8221; as you incorrectly stated, the video so the video outputed is up to 1080p. So what you&#39;re saying is moot in my opinion since the output is a true 1080p, regardless of the the actual image being captured at 1080/60i. The camera has a Digital Signal Processor (DSP) and proprietary software that handles this output conversion. The only case it really matters to record natively at 1080/30p is where the utmost image intregrity must be preserved. There is technically a very small amount of loss in de-interlacing the video, not much, but there is some. Obviously for professional usage, this becomes increasingly important.</p>
<p>Had you stated that no consumer cameras record at true 1080p, I would not have objected to your review. JVC has every right to state the camera is a 1080p camera if it&#39;s input and output is 1080p without upconversion. There is zero upconversion, there is de-interlacing, two very different things.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is not true that all televisions upconvert to progressive format. In<br />fact my older Panasonic CRT is a 1080i device. Not 1080p. Not 720p.<br />Regardless, the point is irrelevant &#8211; the camera&#39;s recording format is what<br />I questioned, not what some television might do with the video.&#8221;</p>
<p>[EVERIO]</p>
<p>Correct. I never said all TVs upconvert. 1080p TVs do de-interlace 1080i signals, this is why it&#39;s not likely HDTV will be broadcast anytime soon at anything more than 1080i. Broadcasting at 1080p would require too much bandwidth and would be pointless since TVs can de-interlace<br />so efficiently. We are talking 1080p, not about your old 1080i TV which can&#39;t handle 1080p. So<br />as I stated, above, if you connect the Everio to a 1080p TV, you will get 1080p video, not 1080i.</p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#39;t come on my site with insulting commentary when you don&#39;t take the time<br />to actually read what&#39;s written. Thanks.&#8221;</p>
<p>[EVERIO] Why post commentary and open up your commentary to comment, then complain when someone calls you on inaccuracy. If you&#39;re going to do this, I&#39;m not sure why you have a comment box. To me, your commentary was insulting and misleading to me, so I responded as such. There is nothing personal in it, I just don&#39;t think it&#39;s fair of you however to make people think they got shafted on this camera with they in fact did not. The camera delivers in spades as advertised.</p>
<p>I do take issue with JVC&#39;s 1080/60p badging on the product tag. They are just saying their DSP and software can supporting de-interlacing to this progressive scan rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonseidman</title>
		<link>http://www.lonseidman.com/2009/05/review-jvc-everio-gz-hd300/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>lonseidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonseidman.com/?p=593#comment-379</guid>
		<description>I stand by my review.  If you took the time to read it (which you clearly&lt;br&gt;did not) I stated the camera records video at 1080i which it does. I also&lt;br&gt;stated that the marketing materials for the camcorder may lead some to&lt;br&gt;believe that the camera records video at 1080p.  It does not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is not true that all televisions upconvert to progressive format.  In&lt;br&gt;fact my older Panasonic CRT is a 1080i device.  Not 1080p.  Not 720p.&lt;br&gt;Regardless, the point is irrelevant - the camera&#039;s recording format is what&lt;br&gt;I questioned, not what some television might do with the video.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don&#039;t come on my site with insulting commentary when you don&#039;t take the time&lt;br&gt;to actually read what&#039;s written.  Thanks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Lon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand by my review.  If you took the time to read it (which you clearly<br />did not) I stated the camera records video at 1080i which it does. I also<br />stated that the marketing materials for the camcorder may lead some to<br />believe that the camera records video at 1080p.  It does not.</p>
<p>It is not true that all televisions upconvert to progressive format.  In<br />fact my older Panasonic CRT is a 1080i device.  Not 1080p.  Not 720p.<br />Regardless, the point is irrelevant &#8211; the camera&#39;s recording format is what<br />I questioned, not what some television might do with the video.</p>
<p>Don&#39;t come on my site with insulting commentary when you don&#39;t take the time<br />to actually read what&#39;s written.  Thanks.</p>
<p>-Lon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everio</title>
		<link>http://www.lonseidman.com/2009/05/review-jvc-everio-gz-hd300/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Everio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonseidman.com/?p=593#comment-378</guid>
		<description>No sir, Wrong, Wrong, Wrong!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1080/60i displays as 1080/30p or 1080/50p depending on the TV. Shame on you for posting ignorant commentary without first understanding what it is you&#039;re saying. Do the math.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Further, most consumer camcorder devices record at 1080i and rely on the TV to de-interlace the i signal to Progressive. Get your facts straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No sir, Wrong, Wrong, Wrong!!!</p>
<p>1080/60i displays as 1080/30p or 1080/50p depending on the TV. Shame on you for posting ignorant commentary without first understanding what it is you&#39;re saying. Do the math.</p>
<p>Further, most consumer camcorder devices record at 1080i and rely on the TV to de-interlace the i signal to Progressive. Get your facts straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lon Seidman</title>
		<link>http://www.lonseidman.com/2009/05/review-jvc-everio-gz-hd300/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Lon Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonseidman.com/?p=593#comment-377</guid>
		<description>You definitely can&#039;t go wrong paying a little bit extra for better quality.  The lack of manual controls on this thing really reduces the quality of image that can come out of it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am a huge fan of the Canon cameras.  I was sent a new HFS10 which I will be reviewing over the weekend.  It is outstanding, can&#039;t wait to play with it more tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You definitely can&#39;t go wrong paying a little bit extra for better quality.  The lack of manual controls on this thing really reduces the quality of image that can come out of it. </p>
<p>I am a huge fan of the Canon cameras.  I was sent a new HFS10 which I will be reviewing over the weekend.  It is outstanding, can&#39;t wait to play with it more tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.lonseidman.com/2009/05/review-jvc-everio-gz-hd300/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonseidman.com/?p=593#comment-376</guid>
		<description>I tested the Everio before deciding on the comparable Sony.  The extra money was well worth the extra image quality.  The Sony also took better still images, even at the high end of the zoom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tested the Everio before deciding on the comparable Sony.  The extra money was well worth the extra image quality.  The Sony also took better still images, even at the high end of the zoom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
